PostGuard Editorial

What the FCA's Financial Adviser Survey Actually Tells Us About Your Competition

The FCA's latest adviser market survey reveals key trends in fees, client numbers, and firm structures. Here's what it means for your practice.

What the FCA's Financial Adviser Survey Actually Tells Us About Your Competition

The FCA has released its latest Financial Adviser Survey findings, and buried in the data are some genuinely useful insights about how the market is shifting. Rather than rehashing the press release, let's look at what this actually means if you're running an advice firm in 2025.

The Headlines Worth Your Attention

The survey covers how advisers are structured, who they're serving, and how they're charging. Three things stand out:

Client numbers are concentrating. Larger firms continue to absorb more of the market's clients. The median adviser now handles around 150 ongoing clients, but this masks significant variation. Firms with robust back-office operations and technology stacks are scaling their adviser capacity, while smaller practices report feeling squeezed.

Fee structures are stabilising. After years of pressure on percentage-based ongoing fees, the data suggests most firms have settled into their pricing models. The typical ongoing advice fee sits between 0.5% and 1% of assets under advice, with fixed-fee arrangements more common for initial advice work. If you've been wondering whether to restructure your fees, the market appears to have found its equilibrium—at least for now.

The advice gap isn't shrinking. Despite regulatory efforts and industry hand-wringing, the proportion of UK adults receiving regulated financial advice remains stubbornly low. The FCA's own figures suggest around 8% of adults took regulated advice in the past year. That's millions of potential clients who aren't being reached by the current model.

What This Means for Smaller Firms

If you're running a practice with fewer than five advisers, the survey data presents a mixed picture.

On one hand, client loyalty remains strong. The FCA found that most advised clients stay with their adviser for extended periods, and satisfaction scores remain high. Your existing book isn't going anywhere fast.

On the other hand, new client acquisition is increasingly expensive. Marketing costs, compliance overhead, and the time required for proper fact-finding mean that bringing on a new client often costs more than the first year's fees. Larger firms can spread these costs across more advisers and more clients. You can't.

The practical response? Focus on referrals and deepening existing relationships rather than competing for new clients through expensive marketing channels. The data suggests that word-of-mouth remains the dominant source of new clients for smaller firms, and that's unlikely to change.

The Consumer Duty Angle

The survey was conducted with Consumer Duty firmly in force, and the findings reflect this. Firms reported spending more time on client communications and documentation. The average time spent on annual reviews has increased, with more emphasis on demonstrating value and ensuring clients understand what they're paying for.

This isn't surprising. Consumer Duty requires firms to evidence that their services deliver fair value. If you're charging 0.75% for ongoing advice, you need to show what that 0.75% actually buys. The firms thriving under Consumer Duty are those that had already built robust service propositions. Those still relying on vague promises of "ongoing support" are finding compliance reviews uncomfortable.

Technology and Social Media

The survey touched on how firms are using technology, and here's where things get interesting for marketing.

More advisers are using social media to reach potential clients, but many reported uncertainty about compliance requirements. The financial promotion rules haven't changed, but enforcement has become more visible. The FCA's recent arrests in connection with illegal financial promotions—three people detained just last week—demonstrate that the regulator is actively pursuing breaches.

For advisers, this creates a tension. You need to market your services to compete, but every LinkedIn post, every tweet, every Instagram story is potentially a financial promotion that must comply with FCA rules. The survey found that many smaller firms simply avoid social media entirely because the compliance risk feels too high.

That's a competitive disadvantage you don't need to accept.

The Practical Takeaway

The FCA's survey confirms what most advisers already sense: the market is professionalising, consolidating, and becoming more competitive. Smaller firms can absolutely thrive, but they need to be smarter about where they spend their time and money.

Focus on your existing clients. Build referral relationships. Document your value proposition clearly. And don't abandon digital marketing just because compliance feels complicated—find ways to manage the risk rather than avoid the opportunity entirely.

The advice gap represents millions of underserved consumers. Reaching them requires visibility. Visibility requires marketing. Marketing requires compliance confidence.

PostGuard automatically checks your social media posts against FCA financial promotion rules before you publish. Catch problems before the FCA does — start with 3 free checks at postguard.online

Don't leave your next post to chance

PostGuard checks every post against Consumer Duty, COBS 4, and FCA social media guidance in seconds. Start with 3 free checks.

Check your first post free